I despise Politico and stopped reading it quite a while ago. Its conservative bias is clear, which means its credibility is zilch in my mind. The Hill is moving into that territory as well. "Both sides do it" is cut from the same disinformation cloth as "stop the steal."
I despise Politico and stopped reading it quite a while ago. Its conservative bias is clear, which means its credibility is zilch in my mind. The Hill is moving into that territory as well. "Both sides do it" is cut from the same disinformation cloth as "stop the steal."
The HIll has been there for awhile. The only reason they dumped the right wing Jon Solomon was that he got exposed for peddling lies about Biden and the Ukraine that came straight from his pal and Steve Bannon partner Peter Schweitzer. Here are some examples of other times the Hill willingly parroted right wing talking points.
Thanks, Theodora. Truth be told (since I am a progressive), I have not imbibed in The Hill that often, so I missed a lot of their agitprop on behalf or the fascists. I more often read Politico, but that's been over for me for awhile now.
I despise Politico and stopped reading it quite a while ago. Its conservative bias is clear, which means its credibility is zilch in my mind. The Hill is moving into that territory as well. "Both sides do it" is cut from the same disinformation cloth as "stop the steal."
The HIll has been there for awhile. The only reason they dumped the right wing Jon Solomon was that he got exposed for peddling lies about Biden and the Ukraine that came straight from his pal and Steve Bannon partner Peter Schweitzer. Here are some examples of other times the Hill willingly parroted right wing talking points.
https://www.mediamatters.org/hill
Thanks, Theodora. Truth be told (since I am a progressive), I have not imbibed in The Hill that often, so I missed a lot of their agitprop on behalf or the fascists. I more often read Politico, but that's been over for me for awhile now.
Truth...has been there for awhile.
Me too.