24 Comments

Take the scenarios over these past three and a half years and superimpose them over Bill and Hillary or Barack and Michelle. What's the over under regarding the major media outlets in this country calling for resigning within the first six months? Yet the Trumps keep marching on and make no mistake, the press's coddling will continue if Trump manages to pull off the coup of reelection. It's amazing how Trump can sight preserving our history when it comes to the Confederacy but the press was mostly silent as Melenia cut down Jackie's trees. The history of the beloved First Lady of an assassinated president is removed and that's okay with the them. Well the glowing articles of the Rose Garden will be good examples to future journalists if Trump wins again. These will be the types of stories they will be reporting on if they want to stay out of jail or worse. I look forward to their articles on next year's grain harvest.

Expand full comment

she is so fake like that thing she calls her husband. them in the WH created a lot of firsts. but firsts we darn well do not need. and yes the media is bought by the rich. vote Blue and get them out. do not rely on the polls. help others get out and vote also. it's life and death

Expand full comment

The Russian Military uniform was a subtle touch; all that was missing were the epaulettes, chest ribbons & ridiculously large brimmed hat

Expand full comment

She's a birther

Expand full comment

Melania's speech was filled with lies - they all were - but at least it doesn't appear to have been plagarized this time.

Expand full comment

The perfidy and treachery of many in mainstream media could be our undoing. We can't cede our power to them out of fear of what we know they are doing but I'm not sure how we battle it, short of just not watching or reading them. I suspect blackmail and payoffs may be in play here with some of them.

Expand full comment

I'll be fairer than the media and note that when The Times did that story in 2017, no one knew that she was actually getting more money out of him. But that is a reminder that The Times and other media have treated the last two Democratic first ladies far differently than they have treated the last two republicans, and I have read occasional references to Laura Bush saying something to her husband about his policies. I have no doubt the Bushes were and are a loving couple, but the idea that the political and personal worlds were entirely separate taxes credulity. In a way, I think some who have been around long enough are still trying to make up for what too many see as the "mistreatment" of Nancy Reagan.

Expand full comment

By the way is there any news outlets that are popular that aren't right wing? you can tell them they fawn over all the fatsos in the WH and the wood chipped fill blonde head of the WH barbie. you know kayleigh or whatever her name is

Expand full comment

Totally on point as usual, Eric. You should be a regular on Morning Joe.

Expand full comment

She sleeps in a separate bedroom in a whole separate HOUSE in Maryland--with her kid and her parents.The DC journalists I know say they don't think it's the public's business. But her helicopter flights to and from DC (I live in the flyway in Bethesda) and how much they cost are certainly the public's business!

Expand full comment

The coverage was abominable. The speech begged the question the DC puppets ignored: Who cares given that not a word reflected the reality of her husband’s America?

As an aside, the refusal to move down to DC may have been legitimate in part. At the time, Barron was enrolled in a special ed program. Moving him suddenly in mid-semester to a new school maybe was not a good idea. And for the record, normally I’d avoid putting him but till his father shows a scintilla of decency, for me he’s fair game. Sorry. Feel free to be offended but no need to tell me you are. A son of a POTUS who’s killed tens of thousands of Americans doesn’t deserve more courtesy than his father extends. Others are suffering far more than little Barron because I ever so slightly invade his privacy.

Expand full comment

Who was Melania really working for in 1990s when she snatched Donald Trump? I think she's a very successful agent working for Putin. a Red Sparrow who got her nude photo "grabbing herself by the p---" published before meeting Donald at a party in 1998. Then she snatched him, married him, and stuck him in front of a TV set with Fox News on. (read more)

https://cityofangels25.blogspot.com/2020/08/who-was-melania-really-working-for-in.html

Expand full comment

Far too many Americans (and this includes a generous portion of the media) love the idea of royalty and would gladly welcome it to the US. The excessive fawning over First Ladies (not only Melanie) is part of that.

Expand full comment

Mr. Boehlert, didn’t see anything outrageously stupid from Trump last night. Tell me where to send the $25. Again tonight?

There is one simple answer why the Trump marriage is not questioned as vigorously as the Clinton. The Clinton coverage was contemporary with the discovery of his infidelity. Mrs. Clinton had choices to make. Trump’s (known) infidelity was a dozen years ago. Mrs. Trump made her choice years ago. There’s no “news” to be had there.

Equally there was little coverage of the Clinton marriage in 2010. A dozen years on.

Expand full comment