Washington Post goes all in with anti-Biden border coverage
If you’d prefer to listen to today’s newsletter, click play.
Note to loyal readers: Please consider subscribing for $6 a month. Thanks for keeping PRESS RUN ad-free!
Stay healthy.
Be kind.
Eagerly joining forces with partisan Republicans, the Washington Post over the weekend uncorked a doomsday write-up about the surge of young migrants currently overwhelming U.S. facilities along the Southern Border. Laying all of the blame for the three-decade problem directly at the feet of the new, two-month-old Democratic administration, the Post article echoed every conceivable GOP talking point.
What the piece failed to do was include crucial context for a complicated policy puzzle, and to delve deeply into whether Trump spent four years deliberately creating a border crisis that Biden is now trying to fix.
The Post also included no context for how Biden's brand new administration has been addressing border crossings while at the same dealing with the aftermath of a deadly insurrection, an impeachment trial, and passing the largest social spending bill in U.S. history. All in less than 60 days.
The Post is hardly alone in manically hyping the border story, at the behest of the GOP. In a highly unusual move, ABC This Week staged its entire Sunday program from the border, in order to focus on the "emerging crisis for the Biden administration."
On Saturday night, Post reporters fanned out on Twitter to tout their breathless story, which Republicans quickly seized upon. "‘No end in sight: Inside the Biden administration’s failure to contain the border surge," posted Josh Dawsey of the Post. Even more frantic was the tweet from colleague Nick Miroff: "How the Biden admin's poor planning, botched messaging, rush to repudiate Trump and a broken asylum system unleashed the biggest border surge in 20 years, with "no end in sight""
Fact: This is not currently the "biggest border surge in 20 years." It's not even close.
The Post article, as Julian Castro advisor Sawyer Hackett noted, was "pure hot garbage, beginning to end." He added, "Where the fuck was the outrage when Trump deported 13K children last year?"
Designed to portray the White House as poised on the brink of a defining and perhaps fatal failure, the Post article was drenched in politics instead of policy — "Republicans are reveling in the administration’s border problems.” The piece stressed the issue of immigration could be a loser for Democrats — it could cost them the House in 2022! — and even "overshadow" the administration's success in vaccinating tens of millions of Americans in recent weeks, and passing the wildly popular $1.9 trillion relief package. All of that could be forgotten, the Post stressed, because more people are trying to cross the U.S. border. That’s an absurd premise that only adds up if you're trying tell this story from a Republican perspective.
Among the article's more egregious failures was its refusal to mention that the surge in unaccompanied minors at the border began during Trump's last year in office, as well as a surge in adults seeking asylum, the Trump team's refusal to cooperate with the Biden White House transition, and the Republicans' deliberate delay in confirming key cabinet members who most closely work on border issues.
Additionally, the article quoted former Department of Homeland Security secretary Chad Wolf attacking the Biden administration. Wolf was a key member of Trump's anti-immigrant border team who worked overtime creating deliberately ineffective, chaotic, and cruel policies, which Democrats are now trying to fix. But Wolf gets to spout off in the Post about how Biden has created a crisis?
Is Biden alone responsible for the current surge? Not according to the Washington Post's own reporting just four months ago: "Attempted crossings have risen as migrants fled the aftermath of powerful hurricanes in Central America and as crime, hunger and political instability continued to ravage numerous countries in Latin America." That's now all been flushed down the memory hole, as the Post amplifies GOP attacks and targets Biden, and Biden alone for the surge.
Also disturbing was the premise from the Post piece, which echoed a Republican talking point: 'There are too many undocumented people crossing the border and in U.S. custody!' Left out of that simplistic and alarmist narrative is the fact that they're in U.S. custody because this Democratic administration has adopted a humane policy of not sending children back to often unlivable conditions. Basically, the Post penalizes Biden for trying to fix Trump's deliberate mess, by wildly hyping the change in border numbers.
"The politicians and the pundits trying to push America back to the “good old days” of 2018, of ripping families apart or condemning them to inhumane refugee camps in Mexico, are shameless," stressed the Philadelphia Inquirer's Will Bunch, after the Post article was published.
In terms of border crossing apprehensions, 2021 is currently on pace to match the 2019 surge under Trump. Where was the panic-stricken media coverage about the border "crisis" then, and how the Republican administration had no policy answer? In truth, Trump touted the huge influx in 2019 because he thought it was good politics for wanting to build a mythical wall across America's southern border, which Democrats opposed.
So when a Republican was in the White House, he claimed the huge border surge was bad news for Democrats, and the press largely played along. Two years later, the press is once again playing along with Republicans, claiming a huge border surge is bad news for Democrats.
(Photo Nicholas Kamm/Getty Images)
GOOD STUFF:
Pressure is mounting on corporate America to take a stand against the GOP’s aggressive campaign to suppress the vote in America.
From Jelani Cobb’s new piece in The New Yorker, “The High Cost of Georgia’s Restrictive Voting Bills”:
The potential economic fallout of the voter-restriction effort started coming into focus last Monday, when the New Georgia Project, which has fought for equal voting access, staged a die-in outside Coca-Cola’s corporate headquarters, to urge it not to support officeholders who vote for the bills. (The day before, the company had tweeted, “RT if you’ve ever hidden the last Coca Cola in the fridge”; the New Georgia Project replied, “RT if you’ve never backed anti-voting legislation.”) Coca-Cola, which donated the site for the civil-rights center, is based in Atlanta, as are Delta, a founding sponsor, and Home Depot, one of whose founders is a major donor.
FUN STUFF — BECAUSE WE ALL NEED A BREAK
Frances Forever, “Space Girl”
Let’s start the week with some irresistible indie pop, courtesy of Boston’s Frances Forever. Launched into the stratosphere via Tik Tok, “Space Girl’s” dreamy, DIY feel and upbeat crush lyrics never fail to generate a smile.
Girl, are you a cancer?
'Cause you make me cry
When we kiss or dance in the sky
We're dancing in the sky
Washington Post goes all in with anti-Biden border coverage
There is no way Biden can satisfy these people. I read that we had stopped sending unaccompanied minors back starting last November but of course the sudden increase has happened because he has made it clear that he and his administrations won’t act like hateful monsters towards desperate migrants they way that Trump and Co. did so the scope of the problem really is.
Forget about the fact that we don’t have the facilities to handle all those people because the Trump administration refused to build enough and because Trump stopped allowing people to apply for asylum at American embassies in their own countries; journalists are stamping their feet and demanding that Mommy fix this problem RIGHT NOW!! Biden must wave his magic wand and make needed facilities appear. The only other choice Biden has would be to send them back to horrendous conditions just as Trump did. If BIden chooses that he will be portrayed as a heartless monster so he loses either way. This is the kind of double bind demands that our media likes to make — but when it comes to Democrats.
The Post has also been hyping vaccine hysteria by writing articles implying there is something wrong with Astra Zeneca. If you read the article you will discover — eventually — that there is no evidence that the number of blood clots experienced by people who have received that vaccine is higher than what normally occurs in a similar population. However you have to read other media outlets to discover that the EU’s shortages are not the result of anything Astra Zeneca has done, they are largely because their governments didn’t make early deals with vaccine makers the way that the US, UK and Chile did. The EU decided to rely on the market to deliver their needed vaccines and it hasn’t worked. But why miss an opportunity to spread fear to get clicks.... In fact my sister-in-law has been so freaked out by the blood clot story she is refusing to get her second Moderna shot.
And yesterday the Post editors were once again fear mongering about inflation from deficit spending but again not calling for a repeal of the budget-busting Trump tax cuts. As in the past four or five such articles their proof is the thinking of Larry Summers and unnamed others. The editors are choosing his judgement over the judgement of Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell who had long track records of dealing successfully with economic problems. But why let objectivity get in the way of a favorite storyline, amirite?
Eric, I knew you’d be all over this one. When I saw that WAPO headline on Twitter yesterday morning I just about lost my mind. When is the so-called MSM going to stop their Joni Mitchell-style “We’ve looked at politics from both sides now” and stop being afraid of being labeled “liberal media?” Stories like this diminish all their great reporting and hurt their credibility. The Times does the same infuriating BS. Keep calling them out on this.