Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lou's avatar

Along with the Times and their obsession with the Trump voters has been CNNs bent on the undecided voters they interviewed after the first debate. Undecided? How can anyone at this point be undecided? This isn't Regan vs. Carter, or Bill Clinton vs. Bush 41' where one could argue a reasonable conservative vs. liberal point of view. These undecided folks fall into a couple of categories. They are either extremely ignorant as to what has gone on the last four years or they just want to vote for Trump and don't want to say so. I'm sure there are voters who are embarrassed to admit they are voting for Trump and won't say so publicly but if the early voting is any indication of where this election is going, Trump is in big trouble. However the real story is after the election and how the Republicans will attempt to steel it by means this nation has never seen before. That's what The NY Times and CNN should be investigating. Buckle up folks. It's going to be a very bumpy ride.

Expand full comment
Jan A's avatar

Can they just change their headlines to be more accurate? "Meet another ignorant Trump voter who can't read but somehow allowed us to interview them even though we're the enemy"--yeah, I know, it's kinda long. Short version: "Some Trumpsters still talk to us, so we'll let them babble."

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts