Is the campaign press rooting for Trump?
Is the campaign press rooting for Trump?
The media wants a close race
The response to PRESS RUN has been so gratifying since its launch. I'm thankful to everyone who reads it. Now I want to offer people a chance to support PRESS RUN— to support its mission of progressive media commentary, its voice, and this work by clicking the “Support,” “Subscribe” buttons, even if you currently receive the email. Yon can support PRESS RUN for cost of a single premium cup of coffee — $6 a month. (Yes, a free sign-up option still exists.)
Ultimately, this newsletter is only possible because of the support of readers like you who are backing a new kind of journalism that's independent and ad-free.
Stay healthy.
Be kind.
Joe Biden created unwanted headlines for his campaign on Friday when he appeared on “The Breakfast Club” and, responding to a question from the show’s co-host, Charlamagne tha God, announced, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.” Biden apologized within hours, saying his comments were “much too cavalier," in terms of speaking for black voters.
On Sunday, the New York Times produced Day Three coverage of the minor story. By contrast, over that same three-day window Trump denounced his former, hand-picked Attorney General as not being "mentally qualified" for the job, accused a cable news host of murder, retweeted a fat-shaming message aimed at Biden's possible vice presidential running mate, and shared a tweet that derided Hillary Clinton as a "skank." Also, during the previous week, Trump accused former President Barack Obama of being a criminal. Yet the Biden "gaffe" coverage generated more media attention and pundit chatter over the weekend. ("Biden" and "black" were mentioned together nearly 200 times on cable news since Friday.)
What could possibly explain that kind of drastic imbalance during a presidential election season? And more importantly, is the campaign press rooting for Trump?
By rooting for Trump, I don't mean journalists and news organizations want him to serve four more years. Rather, are news outlets hoping Trump keeps the race close so the election story will generate clicks and ratings through November? Remember, almost every presidential contest since 1996 has been closely contested, and the Beltway press wants to keep it that way, even though Biden has opened up a sizeable and consistent polling lead as the coronavirus pandemic continues to do lasting damage to Trump's presidency.
Here's the dirty little secret about 2020 campaign coverage: Prior to Covid-19, major news outlets had already dedicated huge amounts of resources to the election and set aside vast amounts of coverage for this election cycle. (Campaign seasons are indeed big business for the news media.) But now that White House campaign doesn't really exist. There are no rallies, neither candidate is barnstorming the country, and might not for months. News outlets still need Biden coverage, though. So his slight misstep on Friday got completely blown out of proportion because news organizations have a shortage of Biden stories.
At the same time, news outlets have too much Trump coverage, since he functions as a human fire hose, relentlessly pumping out false claims and misinformation under the guise of news. Trump's weekend behavior, which resembled a public panic attack, gets downplayed, as Biden's gaffe gets treated as big news. That way the coverage of Biden and Trump appears equal because the press is being balanced covering both candidates.
And then there's the type of campaign coverage that actively pumps up Trump's electoral chances. "Trump has a real shot of winning," announced a CNN piece last week. After acknowledging that Biden leads in virtually every national poll taken this year, and most key swing state polls, CNN stressed, "Biden may be favored, but this race is far from over."
Whenever I read analysis like that I can't help thinking it's an effort by campaign journalists to tap into Democratic anxieties about Trump, in hopes of ginning online traffic and TV ratings. It's hard to imagine that if a Democratic incumbent were overseeing a failed pandemic response, with the country suffering staggering losses that include 100,000 deaths and 40 million lost jobs, the Beltway press would be scrambling to find electoral rays of hope for the Democratic candidate.
CNN's Chris Cillizza last week stressed Trump can win in November because he "gets stuff done," which seems like a bizarre argument to make with 40 million Americans suddenly out of work. Cillizza never mentioned that stunning number, only that the pandemic had "significantly weakened" Trump's economic case for re-election.
It's curious that the last time a Democratic incumbent president ran for re-election, the common media narrative was, 'He might lose.' Today, Trump's running for re-election and the common media narrative is, 'He might win.' Both play off Democratic fears.
Fact: Arizona has voted Republican in eleven of the last twelve presidential elections. Yet Trump hasn't led there since early last winter. That would be like if Biden were trailing in the deep blue state of Massachusetts.
Caveat: I don't know who's going to win and my point here is not to suggest that the press must announce Trump's defeat months in advance. Based on decades of modern campaign coverage, journalists take polling into account in terms of framing the unfolding race, and the person who trails in virtually every poll, as Trump currently does, is tagged as the candidate who faces a stiff uphill challenge.
I can hear the media chorus today: Polls suggested Trump would lose in 2016, which means 2020 could be just like 2016, so we shouldn't pay attention to the polls.
Not true. In late May of 2016, according to all the national polls posted at RealClearPolitics, Trump was tied with Hillary Clinton. Today, according to the same RCP tabulation, Trump trails Biden by six points. Note that Trump leads in just one of the last 55 national polls taken, dating back to mid-February, or just two percent of all polls. Four years ago, during that same stretch from mid-February to mid-May, Trump led in 6 of 37 polls taken, 16 percent of all polls. Also, we've been through a national election cycle since 2016, and Democrats won the 2018 midterm cycle in a rout, just as the polling suggested they would.
Covering the 2020 campaign, the press should make sure they don't put their thumb on the scale for Trump in hopes of marketing a close race.
🎯 GOOD STUFF:
Trump's Memorial Day weekend meltdown followed his infamous Mother's Day weekend meltdown, as he once proudly displayed his manic and dangerous ways, most often via his incoherent Twitter rants, insults and threats. His creepy behavior has become so normalized that we often fail the ask the simply questions.
Writing in the Washington Post, Paul Waldman offers a concise look at one key question: "Can we stop pretending Trump is fit to be president."
The key word there is "pretending." Because that's all that's left from the media's perspective — most are just pretending. Why? Because if journalists stop pretending, they have to acknowledge that the Republican president isn't fit to serve; that there's a mad man roaming the West Wing. Today, that's an accurate description, but it's not a conversation most Beltway journalists and news outlets want to have.
🎸 FUN STUFF — BECAUSE WE ALL NEED A BREAK
Ivan & Alyosha, "Doves"
For the first year that I subscribed to Apple Music, the monthly fee that allows you to have access to basically all the music all the time, I never paid any attention to the New Music Mix. It's a playlist that Apple's magic algorithm produces each week, creating a mix of new music releases based on your tastes and your library. I finally clicked on the Mix about a year ago and now it's become a week go-to for me in terms of finding fun new music and that I likely would have missed otherwise.
That's a long way of saying that I heard this nifty, muscular rock song on the Mix recently. I had no idea who Ivan & Alyosha were, and now the tune's lodged in my heavy rotation. It turns out Ivan & Alyosha are an indie folk/rock duo from Seattle, and neither are named Ivan or Alyosha. (They borrowed those names from the Russian novel, Brothers Karamazov.) "Doves" is off the duo's new EP, Labor On. And if you’re looking for smart, sharp rock songs, this is a great candidate
These days are often compared to the end of Nixon but the big difference was the media used to be fair and balanced and Republicans did put country before party. Today the media, as you so well point out, is all about the ratings and because of that we might have to endure another four years of this madness. The polls look good for Biden but the scary thing is that the Republicans will use dirty tricks and voter suppression to cheat their way to keeping power. Will the media report these stories and take back their role as referee of our democracy or ignore it because the ratings might be better? Unfortunately we know the answer.
This is where the right wing is so much smarter than the left.
First, they work the refs. By making the accusations, they get more favorable coverage. You know it, I know it, and the average three-year-old in Masillon, Ohio, knows it.
Second, they do it because it works. It worked when Nixon sicced his goons on the press, and then the press got cold feet on Iran-Contra because they didn't want to be seen as taking down only republican presidents when, of course, any president who did that would deserve to be taken down (perhaps they forgot their role, which should be heralded, in reporting on Vietnam and how it pretty well destroyed LBJ).
Third, set aside the partisanship. The argument goes to something that sports announcers say about their broadcasts. If they're local, it's best for their team to win, but to face a challenge. If they're national, it's better for the race to go down to the wire. Same principle applies here. What sells? A closer race.